Wednesday, April 7, 2010

Huat arrr

  Huat arr~~~~ not related to my topic today but some how this is the title for today. Talking craps? Yup, today label is talking craps plus some minor personal thinking~

  First of all, some people comment in some site that his friend who go argue that test got people copy answer. He comment his fren as "mental got problem"~ Now what is happening around the world? First of all, what is test ? Why it set? For what purpose? The answer from the student now most propably will be to test how strong is your copy skill when test without let lec see it! OMG~~~ test is made to test ourselves on how far we know the subject and how far we understand it, but not just sit there, use a large angle of departure and copy answer in 522 mode. Maybe my thinking is wrong, test is made to copy only. Maybe i am still live in the ancient time where cannot copy in exam just plug into my head~~~ what ever, grammer sucks but honestly, no one sitting besides me now which i can copy grammer.

  About the stream**, lazy to talk bout it. One conclusion about 100, you call just to argue everything you hate and hear a "sorry, i also cannot do anything, sorry sir" from the operator without solving your problem. 8 counters in ** point is just to tell you diff story. Want an example? Just try yourself by asking each of them the same question. I swear, you will get minimum 2 diff answer.

  This few days i was quite happy. Why? Cuz my cough not stoping, my flu come come and come like water pipe, and my homework press press press and press!!!! Arghhhhhh, WTW with me, more stress more happy? Conclusion, i am noob and i am crazy~~~~

  Talk back something about huat. Anybody know what is huat ge? Is in hokien. Hakka is fat gao... mandrin is fa gao, cantonese is fat gou~~~~ dont ask me in japanese is what? All i can answer you is wakarimasen aka わかりません. I make this kuih togather with my aunt on last sunday and it was nice... lol~ cuz i make de~~~kekekeke

  Last but not least, Huat arrr, dai ge huat arrr~~~

Eat before?

No comments: